jogymnast (August 10th, 2008 @ 11:23 am)

that was flawless!

lolkiwi91794 (July 28th, 2008 @ 8:54 pm)

and i was afraid to do a cartwheel hahaha

481095ymg (July 2nd, 2008 @ 9:31 pm)

what was her score?

Dunntosh (June 11th, 2008 @ 11:50 pm)

With the exception of the 1985 World Championships, when Elena Shushunova & Oksana Omelianchik tied for the gold...

tmc8802 (June 4th, 2008 @ 10:08 am)

i agree it sucks that chellsie won... it goes down as the closest competition in history though, with chellsie only winning by .001

GymMaverick (June 3rd, 2008 @ 9:07 pm)

They were exactly tied, which is why they went to higher start values as the tie breaker I suppose, at least that's the only story I've ever heard. If it was a rounding 'error' I'm sure there would have been a lot more attention paid to it. I like to think of them as 'tied' though, it sucks that they gave it to Chellsie, whatever the reason.

tmc8802 (June 3rd, 2008 @ 8:36 pm)

i thought that it was a rounding "error" that cost nastia the gold...if everything had been carried out to the last decimal point and not rounded, they would've been tied. i had never heard it was related to start values...

sunoxkiissed (June 2nd, 2008 @ 7:36 pm)

absolutely AMAZING performance

PmountxGymChick (March 31st, 2008 @ 9:12 am)

Oh ok! Thank you so much! :)

GymMaverick (March 30th, 2008 @ 6:29 pm)

Chellsie had a harder SV, Start Value, on VT - 9.8 (DTY) to Nastia's 9.7 (1.5TY) - they had 10 SV's on the other events.

PmountxGymChick (March 30th, 2008 @ 9:08 am)

Oh ok thank you! what is a SV overall??

GymMaverick (March 29th, 2008 @ 9:12 pm)

Yes, as well as a silver in the AA after tying with Memmel (she had .1 lower SV overall, which was the tiebreaker).