cdddraftsman (January 8th, 2009 @ 3:55 am)

The people who rendered a opinion as to the source of the shots were tabulated by the HSCA , this is the most precise tabulation to date , here are the results : Direction of where shots originated : 53.8 % TSBD (Concures w/WCR) 33.7 % grassy knoll 4.8 % 2 directions 7.7 % other The number of shots : 76.7 % 3 Shots exactely (Concures w/WCR) 10.5 % 1-2 shots 8.7 % 4+ 4.1 % 2-3 The Warren Commission Rules !

cdddraftsman (January 8th, 2009 @ 3:50 am)

Every hoax has it's antecedents in similar and past hoax's , the techniques involved in the perpetration are quite similar also . Piltdown man Loch Ness Monster UFO's Bigfoot JFK/RFK?MLK Assasinations 911 The 'Big Eight' I like calling them . All are very similar , the evidence is either missing or *They* came in and scooped it up leaving no visible trace . How convenient for a few conspiracy writers so conspiracy itself can live another day of it's useless continued existence .

cdddraftsman (January 8th, 2009 @ 3:47 am)

"the brain & bone matter from the fatal shot primarily went 2 the left & rear of the limo" You need glasses ! Then why does the Z-film show it going up and forwards ? Why does JFK's head go violently forward 2 to 3" 1st before the longer slower back & to the left ? Why did the vast majority of witnesses claim the shots eminated from the TSBD ? Why did LHO buy the gun that fired the shots that killed JFK & leave his gun in the snipers nest ? The list of why's is endless !

cdddraftsman (January 8th, 2009 @ 3:41 am)

leschwartz is full of bullshit ! Analysis by world famed ppl who know photogrammetry prove the majority of all brain matter goes forward & all fragments from that bullet ended up in the forward compartments of the vehicle ! Proof positive that the shots came from behind . This is not contested by those who r serious. Any splash back towards the rear was due 2 heading into a 18mph + wind + car speed of 12mph at the time of the head shot ! Google : Itek or Failure Analysis Assoc.

wiredog73 (January 7th, 2009 @ 12:13 am)

What!! was there a hurricane ib dallas that morning? police officers and civilians as far as 50 plus feet away to the back were hit with blood and brain matter. you tell me 18mph wind is gonna do that?

chasxyz1234 (January 5th, 2009 @ 7:34 pm)

Oswald alone did it, but the Forces Of the Government(hereafter known as F.O.G.) saw the opportunity by paying allegedly free-thinking, independent writers to create different and conflicting false conspiracy theories in order to confuse and distract the general population from all their other true nefarious deeds. I'm afraid to name names but some of these authors initials are E.J.E.,M.L.,A.S.,F.G.,H.W. and S.M.(the last two are deceased). Reject these liars, reject them NOW!!!

cdddraftsman (January 4th, 2009 @ 6:06 pm)

leschwartz is full of bullshit ! Analysis by world famed people who know photogrammetry prove the majority of all brain matter goes forward and all fragments from that bullet ended up in the forward compartments of the vehicle ! Any splash back towards the rear was due to heading into a 18mph+ wind + the car speed of 12mph at the time of the head shot !

leschwartz (January 3rd, 2009 @ 5:55 pm)

Analysis stops video before the body reaction, back and to the left. And there are many uncontested reports saying the brain and bone matter from the fatal shot primarily went to the left and rear of the vehicle. The point of proving shoots from behind the fence at the grassy knoll is to show that Oswald could not have made all of the shots, and did not act alone, hence a conspiracy took place, and hence the government participated at least in the cover up.

cjs1776 (January 3rd, 2009 @ 2:22 am)

The motorcycle officers looking toward the grassy knoll were probably looking at the bystanders dropping to the ground after the first shot was fired. View "Beyond Conspiracy" on YOUTUBE - very enlightening. Thanks for posting!

cjs1776 (January 3rd, 2009 @ 2:12 am)

view "beyond conspiracy" on YOUTUBE - very enlightening

WHOrtiz (January 1st, 2009 @ 5:52 pm)

The distraction on the grassy knoll could have been a diversion to draw attention away from the "shooter".

WHOrtiz (January 1st, 2009 @ 5:46 pm)

I find it funny that you should use the term "clearly" in describing what it is the officers are looking at. At least one "shooter" appears to be the "male" photographer executing a headshot just as he leaves the frame.(No pun intended). Those were the days of the James Bond-like gizmos and the camera should have been the most obvious to consider when searching for clues to an assasination of this magnitude.